User:CElizabethC/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Simone Biles

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I've done gymnastics my whole life and Simone has made many historical changes within the sport.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article on Simone Biles has a strong lead indicating exactly what the article is about and general major points about her as a small recap. The content within the article is really accurate and aligns with all my previous knowledge about her and her career. The one part that I think is not totally up to date is her 2023 meet season leading into the 2024 olympics. The order the information is presented in is easily comprehensible and in chronological order. There might be too much information on each individual meet she has competed at for comprehension but it may be important to validate what is being said in the article. The section about the Larry Nassar assault is missing some information and a little underrepresented. There are some unnecessary photos within the article and the addition of videos may enhance the article. There does not seem to be any bias or information skewed by the author. Sources are established throughout the article and appear to be accurate and correctly cited. The article on Simone Biles is B class. The talk page and edits show mostly corrections between dates and removal of unreliable sources with addition of new more reliable sources. Overall the article seems pretty complete with no major missing information, accurate information, comprehensible, and well sited.