User:CFCF/sandbox/infobox

Diseases
The infoboxes used in the anatomy and disease articles have been unchanged for a longer period, and I have some suggestions I hope can improve them.

Previously I've mentioned the Swedish Socialstyrelsen's Rare disease database:, a very significant portion of which is in English. I've contacted the organization behind the database over whether they would consider licensing the material under CC-BY-SA, which they unfortunately denied. Their reasoning was that they wished for readers to always have access to the newest material, and they could only ensure that this was so by only having the material on their own page. Regardless the database is a high-quality resource I believe we should promote, and their own description of the database is: In Sweden, a disease or disorder is defined as rare when it affects no more than 100 individuals per million population and leads to a marked degree of disability. Currently, over 300 diagnoses are described in the database. Every description includes information on occurrence, cause, heredity, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, resources, patient associations, research and medical references. The information is updated on a regular basis and further diagnoses are frequently added.

My suggestion is that we add links to the database from the infoboxes on Wikipedia.

Anatomy
As of now we have links to Gray's anatomy in the infobox of nearly every anatomy article. The fact of the matter is that while Gray's anatomy 1918 is significant to the medical community it is not the only or even the best resource available.
 * Sobotta's atlas of anatomy is of high quality, and I have uploaded editions from 1906-1911 in their entirety to Wikipedia. Apart from this it is also available at [Hathitrust].
 * Grant's atlas of anatomy is a 1962 public domain atlas of very high quality, and with it follows the 1959?? accompanying text-book Grant's Method of anatomy, both of which are aviable online at [Hathitrust Grant's atlas and texbook of anatomy][#2]. Further I have bought the 1962 edition of Grant's atlas of anatomy and scanned it for use on Wikipedia, and will soon have the entire collection available.

My suggestion or question is then whether we still want to link to Gray's anatomy, and if so do we also want to add links to Grant's and Sobotta's as well? I find it hard to see that we should only link Gray's when it is not the only resource, but I also see a risk in link-clutter in the infobox. Is it possible to make the links smaller at the bottom of the infobox?

Thoughts appreciated, CFCF  (talk · contribs · email)