User:CGamache/sandbox

Public criminology

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Yes, everything in this article is relevant to the article topic. No, there isn't anything that distracted me.


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * No, all information is up to date. Nothing is missing that could be added to this article.


 * What else could be improved?
 * Going off the talk page, it could be less like an essay and more like a Wikipedia page.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Yes this article is neutral and doesn't seem to be heavily biased towards a particular position.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There are viewpoints that are both overrepresented and underrepresented.


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Yes the links in the citations work and they do support the claims in the article.


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Yes, each fact is referenced with a reliable reference. The information comes from scholarly sources and they are neutral sources.


 * Talk Page


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * On the talk page, it was stated that it is more like an essay that would be turned into school, not a Wikipedia page.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * I think it is rated by viewers, authors and Wikipedia. I don't think it is rated well. Yes, it is in interest to some WikiProjects.


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We went into more detail about the topic in class and it was structured differently.