User:CHERMEL.AUS/Design thinking/Leenlovesreading Peer Review

General info
CHERMEL.AUS
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CHERMEL.AUS/Design_thinking?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Design thinking

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. There is no content missing nor content that doesn’t belong. Moreover, the writer shows no bias towards this topic and her tone remains neutral throughout the writing. All her viewpoints were presented in an informative and formal manner. Furthermore, all her content was clearly backed up with 3 cited sources that is relevant to the information stated. The sources came from peer reviewed journals and scholarly articles. Her sources are thorough, current, and include a diverse spectrum of authors. All her links are accessible. In addition, her content is simple and easy to read. It is concise and and dives straight to the point. There are no grammatical errors or spelling mistakes evident. The content is presented in an organized way that is clear to read and understand. Along her content, there were no images added. Undoubtedly, the writers’ content meets Wikipedia’s Notability requirements.

Overall, the content added has definitely improved the quality of the article. The article appears to look more complete with the writers’ finishing touch. It effectively captured the essence of design thinking's role in driving change in education. The inclusion of specific examples adds depth and helps readers better understand how design thinking is being implemented in real-world educational contexts. The content is well-structured and flows smoothly, making it easy to understand the key points being discussed.