User:CJbtw/Sacred White Buffalo Mother Mary Catherine/CJbtw Peer Review


 * Good, concise lead
 * Maybe divide into smaller sections? Early life, Minnesota, North Dakota, etc. (just to make it easier to read/follow)
 * Balanced view point ✅
 * Neutral/unbiased tone ✅
 * Sources seem good


 * All information seems relevant
 * Article seems complete
 * All sources/info are fairly recent
 * Citations could be more specific, include page numbers?
 * Source one is used much more, but not a problem due to number/content of sources

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)