User:CJessica/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The article I have chosen is Cell-based models.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I found this article under the biology related Class-C articles, meaning that it may still need to be improved upon. Cell-based models relate to the study of Cell Biology, which prompted me to select this article. My initial impression was that the article was very short and could use a significant amount of elaboration in various sections. It was also not very visually appealing or organized with enough sections to provide an accurate overview of such a large topic.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this article is far too short. While it is concise, it does not include a brief description of the article sections. The model types and simulation frameworks are not referenced at all in the lead section.

The content of the article is relevant, but not very detailed. There is very little written about the vertex model type. Additionally, the simulation frameworks are simply named and not described at all.

The tone is neutral with no apparent biases present.

The article has a lot of strong citations and links throughout the article. Every point stated has a proper citation. The links work and are appropriately placed throughout the article.

The article is well written and concise; however, the organization may be able to be improved upon. Additional sections could be added to expand upon the topics and provide advantages/disadvantages to each model type.

There are no images or media present in this articles, which decreases the quality greatly. The addition of well-captioned images would improve understanding of the article, especially comparing the different model types visually.

Overall, the article's strengths are it's multitude of citations and concision. However, it lacks a variety of information related to cell-based models. The lack of images is also a major weakness of this article.