User:CL116/sandbox

Article Review Template

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

Article Evaluation
Wikipedia Article: Freeze-Drying
 * The article is mostly relevant though the sections "Silicone Oil Contamination Challenge" and "Protectants" could be elaborated to include why they are relevant to freeze-drying application. Also, "In popular culture" section seems unnecessary.
 * The article seems to be neutral
 * I think this article could have a stronger food focus compared to pharmaceuticals and other applications
 * The links work for the citations and they appear to support the claims in the article which they are cited
 * Additional citations could be added throughout the majority of the article, especially within the "stages" and "applications" sections of the article. The sources appear to be neutral and mostly from journal articles
 * There are some instances which references are outdated and could be updated (e.g. reference 3 and 13). Additional food applications and processing steps could be elaborated further
 * Conversations regarding the article include topic elaboration in pharmaceutical, various edits, clarification of details, and photo needs
 * The article is rated as C-class and has High Importance. Wikipedia Article: Pascalization Feedback -
 * Article is relevant to the topic, however the history section was distracting as it did not relate the naming to Blaise Pascal or Percy Williams Bridgman but rather to B.H. Hite.
 * Article appears to be neutral.
 * The history of pascalization and criticism to the process appear to be over represented, the article should draw more on the process and the effect on food.
 * Citations and links work
 * Citations seem to appear where appropriate and supportive
 * Some information is out of date and inaccurate
 * For instance, C. bot. is a major concern with HPP more so than salmonella
 * A conversation which occurred referenced Pascalization relation to high pressure food preservation and the merging of the 2 pages, also the need for an inncrease in process or technology content.
 * Article is rated as Start-Class and has low importance.
 * The discussion is very basic compared to class discussion and draws heavily on history rather than the process itsel