User:CLMnator/sandbox

Article Evaluation
history of the steam engine I did not see any non-relevant information. No bias. The viewpoints presented were balanced. Links work for most of them. At least two do not work. Sources support the claims. Facts are supported, one has a citation needed on it. None that I could see. Revisions that were unsupported were removed and mentioned on the talk page. It is rated c class in Technology, Energy, History, and start in United KingSandboxdom and Russia/Technology and Engineering/Hstory I do not believe we cover this in class.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Article Draft
User:Seth_Listhartke/sandbox