User:CMLeeLewis/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Psycholinguistics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Aside from its relevance to linguistics, I chose this article because the subject interests me and has been recommended to me by multiple professors in previous classes.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article is clear and concise, and it does a good job of defining the subject. However, it doesn't seem very well connected to the rest of the article, as it scarcely even mentions the different sections of the article. That aside, the article is very informative and seems to be well-sourced; the citations all seem to be from reliable, scholarly sources, although there are places that still need citation. There is no apparent bias, and the article maintains a neutral tone. Most of the sections are balanced well with the others, but the 'History' section is terribly short by comparison and only really discusses the origin of the terminology, rather than the actual history and development of the subject. There are also absolutely no pictures or other visual media to aid with comprehension of the subject. Overall, the article is clear and informative, but it feels somewhat incomplete. It may help to expand the 'History' section to include more relevant information and provide better balance to the article as a whole. It may also help to include some visual references to help people better understand the topic.