User:CSD2020UPRC/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Deformity


 * Article Evaluation
 * The content needs a lot of improvements, the data is incomplete, and the "Lead" should be more abundant in the definition and description of the content. It has conclusions and asseverations that can not be confirmed with the reference. It is not clear if the article is neutral due to the " In mythology" section in which the data can be confirmed in the sources and looks like someone's conclusion. Each claim does not have a citation, but the only source in the article it seems reliable. I would recommend adding an extensive expiation of how deformities presented in animals and humans, including the cause and effect, the view of deformities through history, name of different conditions, and a more elaborate explanation with proves of deformities in mythology. The content does not have a lot of grammatical errors and is easy to read. This article does not cover the gaps of the minorities, since at no time does it mention the people who have these deformities, nor the problems beyond physical or biological of people with deformities. The article has been rated as Start-class and Mid-importance of WikiProject Medicine.
 * This article is that most call my attention, it has a lot to improve, and I think that people with deformities have to have their own space in Wikipedia. In Conclusion, having this topic as a "taboo" has to stop.


 * Sources
 * Albert, T. J., & Heary, R. F. (2014). Spinal Deformities : The Essentials: Vol. Second edition. Thieme.
 * Schmiesing, A. (2014). Disability, Deformity, and Disease in the Grimms’ Fairy Tales. Wayne State University Press.
 * Kim, K., Jeong-Hyeon, S., Woojae, M., Maurizio, F., Mischoulon, D., Papakostas, G. I., . . . Jeon, H. J. (2019). Deformities of the globus pallidus are associated with severity of suicidal ideation and impulsivity in patients with major depressive disorder. Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group), 9(1) DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-43882-4
 * Nadja Durbach. (2010). Spectacle of Deformity : Freak Shows and Modern British Culture. University of California Press.
 * Başkan, B.M., Sivas, F., Alemdaroğlu, E. et al. Association of bone mineral density and vertebral deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis . Rheumatol Int 27, 579–584 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-007-0323-8
 * LAINE, V. A., SAIRANEN, E., & VAINIo, K. A. U. K. O. (1957). Finger deformities caused by rheumatoid arthritis. JBJS, 39(3), 527-533.
 * https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/deformity

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Antacid


 * Article Evaluation
 * The content is relevant to the topic. There still things that could be written more clearly for those who do not know about the topic. Even though the definition is right, the "lead" should be reorganized and modified. Also, it would be excellent to add more information to the different sections of the article. I am not sure if is appropriate for this article, but I believe that it has to be added to the different representation of an antacid. For example, tablets, capsule, suspension, powder, and chewable tablets. As been discussed in the Talk page, the content needs an "Interactions" section. Talk page that has been inactive since 2019. The article is in a neutral tone and all of the claims have citations. The article only has one link that does not redirect you to another one in Wikipedia that is Andrews. Besides, The article presents a lot of spelling and grammar errors. The oldest reference is from 1991 and the recent one is from 2017. In addition, the last time that this article was edited on September 5, 2020, when someone added a comma. The article is part of the WikiProject Pharmacology as C-class, High-importance and is part of the WikiProject Medicine as C-class, Mid-importance.
 * The reason why I have chosen this article is that I like pharmacology,  and I believe people should have the best data at hand. In this way, we could prevent accidents and misuse of medications.


 * Sources
 * (*reminder: this source need to be check)
 * Desai C. (2016). Meyler's side effects of drugs: The international encyclopedia of adverse drug reactions and interactions. 48(2), 224. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=NOKoBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Meyler%27s+Side+Effects+of+Drugs+(Sixteenth+Edition)&ots=v5VeEKw6Ng&sig=r-b7moOR8Th9hZzqrUJdiEZfTT0#v=onepage&q=Meyler's%20Side%20Effects%20of%20Drugs%20(Sixteenth%20Edition)&f=false
 * Singh P.(2019) Terrell JM. Antacids. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL) https://europepmc.org/article/NBK/NBK526049
 * Singh P.(2019) Terrell JM. Antacids. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL) https://europepmc.org/article/NBK/NBK526049

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Pharmacology


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article content is relevant to the topic. In the article is indicated that needs some cleanup and has few grammatical errors. Also, it has a lot of data that does not have any citations in the content. I think that there is some concept (words) that can be added to it a redirection link to another Wikipedia article. Besides, even though the content is good, I would subdivide some section information into bullets or categories. For example, in the "Division" section, the "Systems of the body" and "Clinical practice and drug discovery" the data is relevant but has a lot of information that can be less complex. The article is part of the WikiProject Medicine is rated as C-class/High-Importance, the WikiProject Pharmacology is rated C-class/Top-Importance, and the WikiProject Technology and is rated as C-class. I found this article when I was searching for "Posology" and surprise me that do not explain what posology is.


 * Sources
 * Hanson, G. F. (1908). Some notes on posology. California State Journal of Medicine, 6(4), 132. ISSN 0093402X Retrieved from http://uprcayey.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.uprcayey.idm.oclc.org/docview/1774664313?accountid=44829
 * Pugsley, M. K., Authier, S., & Curtis, M. J. (2008). Principles of safety pharmacology. British journal of pharmacology, 154(7), 1382-1399. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjp.2008.280
 * Hite, M. (1997). Safety Pharmacology Approaches. International Journal of Toxicology (Taylor & Francis), 16(1), 23–32. https://doi-org.uprcayey.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/109158197227332
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/109158197227332

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Catabolism


 * Article Evaluation
 * The content is relevant to the topic and has a clear definition. The article is written in a neutral tone and only has a few grammatical errors. Not all the claims have a citation, and also the article only uses one source of information. The source from apparently the information came from only have a short definition of catabolism, which is from 1997. It does not seem like a source that can support the data in the article. In addition to adding more sources, I would add to the definition that catabolism is the major pathway to cellular respiration. Furthermore, images and media to give a visual explanation of the topic. This article is part of the WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology and has been rated Start-class and High-Importance.


 * Sources
 * Reminder*
 * Biology class book (revise if is a good source)

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Pharmacognosy


 * Article Evaluation
 * I chose this article because I am interested in this topic since I want to study PharmD. The content is relevant, and gives a explanation of what is pharmacognosy. Although, has a lot of grammatical errors that need to be corrected. The article is written very well, has a neutral tone, and does not try to persuade the reader. Not all the claims has a citation and needs more references. Overall, I really enjoy the "Description" section even though I would like to add more information about the history of pharmacognosy.


 * Sources
 * Cortez-Gallardo, V., Macedo-Ceja, J. P., Hernández-Arroyo, M., Arteaga-Aureoles, G., Espinosa-Galván, D., & Rodríguez-Landa, J. F. (2004). Farmacognosia: breve historia de sus orígenes y su relación con las ciencias médicas. Revista Biomédica, 15(2), 123-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32776/revbiomed.v15i2.381