User:CSUEB KD/sandbox

=Article Evaluation= Design

Evaluating content

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Yes. No.


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

No. There could be an inclusion of dates and/or time periods- there's not a lot of them.


 * What else could be improved?

Adding more content and information regarding design. It's more of an article at a glance- not much being said.

Evaluating tone

 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Yes. No


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

I think there's a lack of viewpoints as this is not a topic that has a lot of viewpoints.

Evaluating sources

 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Yes, they work. Yes.


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Yes. It comes from books, and a few archived webpages. Yes, they are neutral.

Checking the talk page

 * Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

Discussions include: adding more information, the nature of the page, removing some content, and some of the sections on the article.


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

It's a class C article- meaning it's a page that IS NOT an article.


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

There's a lack of information, and different viewpoints. It's a topic/article that no one cares about.