User:CSwikipolly/Collaborative writing

Collaborative writing
Collaborative writing is a procedure in which two or more persons work together to create a written document or content. This writing tool takes many different forms, including but not limited to academic papers, reports, creative writing, projects, and business proposals. Success in collaborative writing involves a division of labor, unique insights, and most importantly writing techniques. Oftentimes through a shared document, collaborators add edits, provide feedback, and record changes. Collaborative writing is often used in professional as well as educational settings, utilizing the expertise of those involved in the collaboration process.

 Definition  Collaborative writing engages two or more persons in the process of producing a written work as a group, where everyone involved is contributing content or decisions on the work being produced. [1]


 * Interaction between participants throughout the entire writing process. Whether it be brainstorming, writing a draft of the project, or reviewing.
 * Shared power among participants. Everyone included in the project has the power to make decisions and no group member is in charge of all the text produced.
 * The collaborative production of one single and specific text.

History

In Rhetoric, Composition, and Writing Studies, scholars have demonstrated how collaborative learning in U.S. contexts has been informed by John Dewey's progressivism in the early twentieth century. Collaboration and collaborative writing gained traction in these fields in the 1980s especially, as researchers reacted to poststructuralist theories related to social constructionism and began theorizing more social views of writing.

 Types and Process 

Collaborative writing processes are extremely context-dependent. In scholarship, on both academic and business writing, multiple terminologies have been identified for collaborative writing processes, including:


 * Single-author writing or collegial: one person is leading, they compile the group ideas and do the writing.
 * Sequential writing: each person adds their task work then passes it on for the next person to edit freely.
 * Horizontal-division or parallel writing: each person does one part of the whole project and then one member compiles it.
 * Stratified-division writing: each person plays a role in the composition process of a project due to talents.
 * Reactive or reciprocal writing: group all works on and writes the project at the same time, adjusting and commenting on everyone's work.

Collaborative writing may occur in face-to-face settings, when writers gather together in a shared location, or in digital settings when writers are separated by both time and distance

The process of collaborative writing involves a couple of different levels. The process of collaborative writing begins with planning and goal setting. The group of two or more individuals meet and begin laying out the goals and steps they’re going to take to complete the work. Next, members of the group will begin researching, and finding information on the topic they are working on. After that, the group will begin outlining and structuring the research into a rough draft. Next, the group will collaborate to create a draft that they will then revise and edit. Finally, the group will begin proof-reading prior to publishing their work. With the draft, edited, proofread, and revised, the group will then publish the work they collaborated to create. [2]

 Uses of collaborative writing 

Collaborative writing may be used in instances where a workload would be overwhelming for one person to produce. Therefore, ownership of the text is from the group that produced it and not just one person.

In 2012, Bill Tomlinson and colleagues provided the first extensive discussion of the experiential aspects of large-scale collaborative research by documenting the collaborative development process of an academic paper written by a collective of thirty authors; their work identifies key tools and techniques that would be necessary or useful to the writing process, and to discover, negotiate, and document issues in massively authored scholarship.

In 2016, Researchers Joy Robinson, Lisa Dusenberry, and Lawrence M. Halcyon conducted a case study investigating the productivity of a team of writers who utilized the practice of interlaced collaborative writing and found that the team was able to produce a published article, a two-year grant proposal, a digital and physical poster, a midterm research report, and conference presentation over the course of three years. The writers used virtual tools such as Google Hangouts' voice feature for group check-ins, to hold group discussions, and to write as a group. They used Google Docs to allow each team member to edit and add writing to a shared document throughout the writing process.

Another motive for using collaborative writing is to increase the quality of the completed project by combining the expertise of multiple individuals and for allowing feedback from diverse perspectives. Collaborative writing has been proven to be an effective method of improving an individual's writing skills, regardless of their proficiency level, by allowing them to collaborate and learn from one or more partners and participate in the co-ownership of a written piece. Instructors may utilize this technique to create more student-centered and collaborative learning environments, or they may use it themselves to cross-collaborate with other academics to produce publishable works.

 Views on collaborative writing 

Linguist Neomy Storch, in a 2005 Australian study, discovered that reflections pertaining to collaborative writing in regards to second language learners in the classroom were overwhelmingly positive. The study compared the nature of collaborative writing of individual work versus that of group work, and Storch found that although paired groups wrote shorter texts, their work was more complex and accurate compared to individual works. The study consisted of 23 total participants: 5 doing individual work and 18 working in pairs. The pairs consisted of two male pairs, four female pairs and three male/female pairs. Post-assignment interviews revealed that the majority of students (16) yielded positive opinions about group work, but two students felt that group work is best reserved for oral activities and discussions rather than writing assignments. The majority of interviewees gave positive reviews, but one argued that group work was difficult when it came to criticizing another's work and another argued that there is a power imbalance when writing is based on ability. The two students who were stark opponents of collaborative writing revealed that it was hard to concentrate on their work and they were embarrassed by their supposedly poor English skills.

Jason Palmeri found that when it came to inter-professional collaboration, most of the issues stemmed from miscommunication. In differing disciplines, one person may have a level of expertise and understanding that is foreign to another. Palmeri's study provided the example of a nurse and an attorney having different areas of expertise, so therefore they had differing understanding of concepts and even the meaning of the same words. While many of the issues resulted from miscommunication, the study found that some nurse consultants resisted change in terms of altering their writing style to fit the understanding or standards of the attorneys.

Obstacles to collaborative work include a writers' inability to find time to meet with the rest of the group, personal preferences for organization and writing process, and a fear of being criticized.

 Collaborative writing as an educational tool 

Collaborative writing is an approach to writing that many educators use every day, it helps to improve writing skills by making students team up with one another to handle an assignment. Collaborative writing can make a big difference in students' writing because when working with others they will be forced to share ideas and writing styles with each other. The other great thing about collaborative writing is the fact that it can be used in online schooling and in-person schooling, it is better in person though because it’s easier to communicate with each other and peer review one another. Collaborative writing can also improve confidence when talking to each other. Students also feel a sense of motivation when working with their fellow peers.

Research conducted by scholars about collaborative writing in education began in the early 1900s. Research discovered that language exchangers between peers to create these writings were beneficial and they called them language-related episodes. This is due to learners being able to socialize their language of choice and they were learning while discussing ideas, which allowed students to learn from each other. Worksheets tend to focus on language structures, collaborative writings focuses more on the speech part of language. Collaborative writing also helps students to learn new writing styles such as analyzing writing as stated by Vanderbilt University “Collaboration gives students practice in analyzing writing. It is easier to see where a classmate’s writing is going awry than it is to find flaws in one’s own prose” (Vanderbilt University).

Grouping seems to be very important when it comes to collaborative writing, as bigger groups tend to have more ideas shared whereas smaller groups will have less and tend to focus on grammar. Another great way to have a strong collaborative writing process is to have good communication with each other and everyone knows what roles they are doing. As said by Campbell “Speaking of communication, it is helpful to ensure everyone knows their role. Sometimes, a project can get going, but many people do not know exactly who is responsible for what.” (Campbell 2023). Students also perform better face-to-face since there is more discussion to be had. It is also discovered that students who are silent still benefit from collaborative writing by observing their peer's writings.

Some students still may favor individual writing since the process is easier and less time-consuming. Students' opinions on collaborative writing may also be swayed by their experience, such as if team members delete or add text without discussion with their group, which will make them prefer individual writing. It is also stated that generally, students with more communication and discussions will have a positive view of collaborative writing.

 Collaborative writing in the workplace 

A study conducted by Stephen Bremner, an English professor at the City University of Hong Kong, investigated eight business communication textbooks to test the depth in which they provided students with a knowledge of collaborative writing in the workplace and how to execute those processes. The study found that, generally, textbooks highlighted the role of collaborative writing in the workplace. Textbooks listed the pros of collaborative writing such as saving time, more superior documents due to each individual's strengths and specialized knowledge, a well-crafted message due to team work, balanced abilities, and an interest in accomplishing a common goal.

The article claimed that the textbooks examined gave students a basic knowledge of collaboration in the workplace, but they also lacked the information that showed students the realities of collaborative writing in the workplace with few activities presented in the textbooks that mirror collaborative activities in the workplace. Much of the activities that featured group work seemed more idealistic rather than based in reality, where the writing process occurred in only controlled and orderly environments. Bremner also found that group work in the classroom also did not properly simulate the power hierarchies present in the workplace.

Jason Palmeri found that when it came to inter-professional collaboration, most of the issues stemmed from miscommunication. In differing disciplines, one person may have a level of expertise and understanding that is foreign to another. The article gave the example of a nurse and an attorney having different areas of expertise, so therefore they had differing understanding of concepts and even the meaning of the same words. While much of the issues resulted from miscommunication, the article claimed that some nurse consultants resisted change in terms of altering their writing style to fit the understanding or standards of the attorneys.

 Tools 


 * Atlas is a wiki-like git-managed authoring platform from O'Reilly Media that is based on the open-source web-based Git repository manager (version control system) "GitLab".
 * For collaborative code-writing, mostly revision control systems like Team Foundation Version Control (used in Team Foundation Server) and Git (used in GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and CodePlex) are used in parallel writing.
 * Collaborative real-time editors like Etherpad, Hackpad, Google Docs, Microsoft Office, and Authorea.
 * Online platforms mainly focused on collaborative fiction that allow other users to continue a story's narrative such as Protagonize and Ficly.
 * Wikis like Wikipedia and Wikia.

 Authorship 

See also: Joint authorship

An author acquires copyright if their work meets certain criteria. In the case of works created by one person, typically, the first owner of a copyright in that work is the person who created the work, i.e. the author. But, when more than one person creates the work in collaboration with one another, then a case of joint authorship can be made provided some criteria are met.

 See also 


 * Collaborative editing
 * Content management system (CMS)
 * Document collaboration
 * Document management system
 * Job sharing
 * Joint authorship
 * Mass collaboration
 * Networked book
 * New Worlds Project
 * Online word processors
 * Project management
 * Real-time text

 References 


 * Jump up to:
 * a b c Bremner, Stephen (2010-04-01). "Collaborative writing: Bridging the gap between the textbook and the workplace". English for Specific Purposes. 29 (2): 121–132. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.001. ISSN 0889-4906.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy (2013). "Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms". Multilingual Matters.
 * ^ Lowry, P.B.; Curtis, A.; Lowry, M.R. (2004). "Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice". Journal of Business Communication. 41 (1): 66–99. doi:10.1177/0021943603259363. S2CID 15241066.
 * Jump up to:
 * a b Sharples, M., Goodlet, J. S., Beck, E. E., Wood, C. C., Easterbook, S M., & Plowman, L. (1993). Research issues in the study of computer supported collaborative writing. In M. Sharples (ed.) Computer supported collaborative writing. London: Springer, 9-28.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy (2013-07-04). Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms. Multilingual Matters. doi:10.21832/9781847699954. ISBN 978-1-84769-995-4.
 * ^ Ede, Lisa S.; Lunsford, Andrea A. (1992). Singular texts/plural authors : perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 0809317931. OCLC 23768261.
 * ^ Schindler, Kirsten and Wolfe, Joanna "Beyond single authors: Organizational text production as collaborative writing" Handbook of writing and text production. Berlin: De Gruyter, Mouton, 2014 p. 160
 * ^ Lundsford, Andrea (1991). "Collaboration, Control, and the Idea of a Writing Center" (PDF). The Writing Center Journal. 12 (1): 3–10.
 * ^ Singh-Gupta, Vidya (May 1996). "Preparing Students for Teamwork through Collaborative Writing and Peer Review Techniques" (PDF). Teaching English in the Two-Year College. 23: 127–136.
 * ^ Holt, Mara (2018). Collaborative learning as democratic practice: A history. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. ISBN 978-0-8141-0730-0.
 * ^ Encyclopedia of rhetoric and composition : communication from ancient times to the information age. Theresa Enos. New York. 1996. ISBN 0-8240-7200-6. OCLC 33276421.
 * ^ Sharples, M.; Goodlet, J. S.; Beck, E. E.; Wood, C. C.; Easterbrook, S. M.; Plowman, L. (1993), "Research Issues in the Study of Computer Supported Collaborative Writing", Computer Supported Collaborative Writing, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Springer London, pp. 9–28, doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2007-0_2, ISBN 9783540197829
 * Jump up to:
 * a b c d e Lowry, Paul Benjamin; Curtis, Aaron; Lowry, Michelle René (2004-01-01). "Building a Taxonomy and Nomenclature of Collaborative Writing to Improve Interdisciplinary Research and Practice". The Journal of Business Communication. 41 (1): 66–99. doi:10.1177/0021943603259363. ISSN 0021-9436. S2CID 15241066.
 * ^ Hart, Richard L (September 2000). "Co-authorship in the academic library literature: A survey of attitudes and behaviors". The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 26 (5): 339–345. doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(00)00140-3. ISSN 0099-1333.
 * Jump up to:
 * a b Tomlinson, Bill; et al. (2012). Massively distributed authorship of academic papers. 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. Austin, Texas, USA. pp. 11–20. doi:10.1145/2212776.2212779.
 * ^ Robinson, Joy; Dusenberry, Lisa; Lawrence, Halcyon M. (October 2016). "Collaborative strategies for distributed teams: Innovation through interlaced collaborative writing". 2016 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC). Austin, TX, USA: IEEE. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1109/IPCC.2016.7740489. ISBN 9781509017614. S2CID 12405890.
 * ^ Pham, Vu Phi Ho (January 2021). "The Effects of Collaborative Writing on Students' Writing Fluency: An Efficient Framework for Collaborative Writing". SAGE Open. 11 (1): 215824402199836. doi:10.1177/2158244021998363. ISSN 2158-2440. S2CID 232484423.
 * Jump up to:
 * a b Storch, Neomy (2005-09-01). "Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections". Journal of Second Language Writing. 14 (3): 153–173. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002. ISSN 1060-3743. S2CID 1256668.
 * ^ Palmeri, Jason (2004-01-01). "When Discourses Collide: A Case Study of Interprofessional Collaborative Writing in a Medically Oriented Law Firm". The Journal of Business Communication. 41 (1): 37–65. doi:10.1177/0021943603259582. ISSN 0021-9436. S2CID 145397761.
 * ^ Jones, Darolyn Lyn; Jones, James W.; Murk, Peter J. (2012). "Writing collaboratively: Priority, practice, and process". Adult Learning. 23 (2): 90–93. doi:10.1177/1045159512443526. S2CID 141689168.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy (September 2005). "Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections". Journal of Second Language Writing. 14 (3): 153–173. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002. ISSN 1060-3743. S2CID 1256668.
 * ^ Krishnan, Jenell (2019). Formative Assessment during Online Collaborative Writing in Middle Schools (Thesis). UC Irvine.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy (January 2019). "Collaborative writing". Language Teaching. 52 (1): 40–59. doi:10.1017/S0261444818000320. ISSN 0261-4448. S2CID 232397924.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy; Wigglesworth, Gillian (2006-12-31), "Chapter 8. Writing Tasks: The Effects of Collaboration", Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning, Multilingual Matters, pp. 157–177, doi:10.21832/9781853599286-011, ISBN 9781853599286, retrieved 2022-03-27
 * ^ Shehadeh, Ali (December 2011). "Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2". Journal of Second Language Writing. 20 (4): 286–305. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010. ISSN 1060-3743.
 * ^ King, Carla (1 April 2014). "6 Great Self-Publishing Tools for Small Press and Author Co-Ops". PBS.org. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
 * ^ Kowal, Maria; Swain, Merrill (January 1994). "Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness1". Language Awareness. 3 (2): 73–93. doi:10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845. ISSN 0965-8416. S2CID 145407350.
 * ^ Antón, Marta; DiCamilla, Frederick (1998-04-01). "Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom". The Canadian Modern Language Review. 54 (3): 314–342. doi:10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314. ISSN 0008-4506.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy (September 1998). "Comparing Second Language Learners' Attention to Form Across Tasks". Language Awareness. 7 (4): 176–191. doi:10.1080/09658419808667108. ISSN 0965-8416.
 * ^ SWAIN, MERRILL; LAPKIN, SHARON (September 1998). "Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together". The Modern Language Journal. 82 (3): 320–337. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x. ISSN 0026-7902.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy; Wigglesworth, Gillian (2003-12-01). "Is There a Role for the Use of the L1 in an L2 Setting?". TESOL Quarterly. 37 (4): 760. doi:10.2307/3588224. ISSN 0039-8322. JSTOR 3588224.
 * ^ Fernández Dobao, Ana (March 2012). "Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work". Journal of Second Language Writing. 21 (1): 40–58. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002. ISSN 1060-3743.
 * ^ Storch, Neomy; Aldosari, Ali (2012-10-16). "Pairing learners in pair work activity". Language Teaching Research. 17 (1): 31–48. doi:10.1177/1362168812457530. ISSN 1362-1688. S2CID 145674614.
 * ^ Mozaffari, Seyedeh Hamideh (2016-04-11). "Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing". Language Teaching Research. 21 (4): 496–516. doi:10.1177/1362168816641703. ISSN 1362-1688. S2CID 146916799.
 * ^ Rouhshad, Amir; Storch, Neomy (2016-02-26), "10. A focus on mode", Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning, Language Learning & Language Teaching, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, vol. 45, pp. 267–289, doi:10.1075/lllt.45.11rou, ISBN 978-90-272-1332-7, retrieved 2022-03-27
 * ^ Dobao, Ana Fernández (2016-02-26), "1. Peer interaction and learning", Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning, Language Learning & Language Teaching, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, vol. 45, pp. 33–61, doi:10.1075/lllt.45.02fer, ISBN 978-90-272-1332-7, retrieved 2022-03-27
 * ^ Strobl, Carola (2014-01-31). "Affordances of Web 2.0 Technologies for Collaborative Advanced Writing in a Foreign Language". CALICO Journal. 31 (1): 1–18. doi:10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18. ISSN 0742-7778.
 * ^ McDonough, Kim; Crawford, William J.; De Vleeschauwer, Jindarat (2016-02-26), "7. Thai EFL learners' interaction during collaborative writing tasks and its relationship to text quality", Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning, Language Learning & Language Teaching, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, vol. 45, pp. 185–208, doi:10.1075/lllt.45.08mcd, ISBN 978-90-272-1332-7, retrieved 2022-03-27
 * Jump up to:
 * a b Storch, Neomy (2005-09-01). "Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections". Journal of Second Language Writing. 14 (3): 153–173. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002. ISSN 1060-3743. S2CID 1256668.
 * ^ Palmeri, Jason (2004-01-01). "When Discourses Collide: A Case Study of Interprofessional Collaborative Writing in a Medically Oriented Law Firm". The Journal of Business Communication. 41 (1): 37–65. doi:10.1177/0021943603259582. ISSN 0021-9436. S2CID 145397761.
 * ^ King, Carla (1 April 2014). "6 Great Self-Publishing Tools for Small Press and Author Co-Ops". PBS.org. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
 * ^ "Getting Started with Atlas". GitHub. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
 * ^ "GitLab About - Built with GitLab". Retrieved 10 May 2015.
 * ^ Lomas, Natasha (2014-09-22). "Authorea Nabs $610k For Its Bid To Become A 'Google Docs For Scientists'". TechCrunch.
 * a b Storch, Neomy (2005-09-01). "Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections". Journal of Second Language Writing. 14 (3): 153–173. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002. ISSN 1060-3743. S2CID 1256668.
 * ^ Palmeri, Jason (2004-01-01). "When Discourses Collide: A Case Study of Interprofessional Collaborative Writing in a Medically Oriented Law Firm". The Journal of Business Communication. 41 (1): 37–65. doi:10.1177/0021943603259582. ISSN 0021-9436. S2CID 145397761.
 * ^ King, Carla (1 April 2014). "6 Great Self-Publishing Tools for Small Press and Author Co-Ops". PBS.org. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
 * ^ "Getting Started with Atlas". GitHub. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
 * ^ "GitLab About - Built with GitLab". Retrieved 10 May 2015.
 * ^ Lomas, Natasha (2014-09-22). "Authorea Nabs $610k For Its Bid To Become A 'Google Docs For Scientists'". TechCrunch.