User:CUStudentFJ/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Digital media use and mental health

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I'm passionate about owning the things that destabilized the mental health of humanity and society.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section & Content - First paragraph helps keep the reader unbias towards a specific side of the story but presents the idea that this perspective is still an active topic for discussion/debate.

Tone and Balance & Sources and References - The author(s) write to provide clear cut information versus general opinion. The article is supported by over 180 citations/references as well as links for further reading on the entire subject's directive.

Organization and Writing Quality & Images and Media - The article was a very descriptive read and didn't make it hard for readers to understand the overarching message. There were very little photos used to depict the article. However, this seems deliberate on the writer's part to help further the point that information based on facts should be written as detailed as possible. I think the author(s) possibly want to empower the reader(s) to look past flashy focal points and seek more depth behind the activities you do or information consumed.

Talk page discussions & Overall impression - Seems like the author(s) were very open to constructive criticism. A lot of questions posed by the original writer as well as new ones on the content they'd like to revise, consolidate, or create new. Very comfortable setting/article to receive information and as well as provide valuable perspective or text. The article clearly tried to explain all key points to readers who may not be privy to the matter being discussed, in addition to the cited articles. I appreciate writing that allows you to make your own decision by providing definitive information without forcing a bias.