User:CVHWI/Prelingual deafness/SarahLiz P3N Peer Review

General info
·     CVHWI

·     User:CVHWI/Prelingual deafness

Lead
Lead evaluation

The content was reorganized to reflect the new content added. The introductory sentence is concise and sets the tone for the article's topic. Lead section could be more clear on the article's major sections. Overall, the lead is concise and not overly detailed.

Content
Content evaluation

The content is relevant and important to the topic. It adds knowledge and further explains the causes of prelingual deafness and the impact on speech and language acquisition. Comparing the original article and added content, the statistical content was updated and is accurate. The content of reorganized section "causes of prelingual deafness" fits the article's topic and adds relevant content such as the different types of genetic syndromes there are.

Tone and Balance
Tone and balance evaluation

The content of speech and language acquisition seems to be missing a balance of "speech acquisition" and "visual language acquisition". The content of language acquisition is underrepresented in way that it only talks about speech acquisition. This section could be more balanced by explaining both spoken language acquisition and visual language acquisition equally. Overall, I didn't observe any bias statements toward a particular view.

Sources and References
Sources and references evaluation

The content is all supported by a reliable secondary source of information and I did not see any primary sources. The oldest source used was from 1994, although, there are other newer sources that seem to support this source. I noticed two sources did not have a direct link inserted, if it does, it did not work for me:

1.    Mayberry, Rachel (2002). Segalowitz and Rapin (ed.). Handbook of Neuropsychology (2 ed.). chapter 4. pp. 71–107.

2.    Margolis (2001). Implications of Prelingual Deafness. 358: Lancet. p. 76.

Organization
Organization evaluation

The content added is well-written and easy to read. Sections could be organized into main heading of "language acquisition" with subheadings of "speech" and "visual language". I did not observe any major grammatical or spelling errors.

Overall impressions
Overall evaluation

The content reorganized and added contributes to overall understanding of prelingual deafness. It described language acquisition in a concise manner that is easy to read. It helps readers to clarify what causes and types of causes of prelingual deafness are, clarifies updated statistics on prelingual deafness, and describes the implications deafness has on speech and language acquisition.