User:CXthree/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Search and rescue dog

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Completed a seminar research project on this topic, wanted to further my knowledge and share it with others.

Evaluate the article
Lead sentence is good, gives very brief detail of the topic being discussed, does however limit to only "missing people after a natural or man-made disaster". It is concise but could include additional information of other uses for search and rescue dogs. The article could use updated, considering application portion of the article only focus on the use of cadaver dogs in Croatia. Many more organizations could be added that use search and rescue fogs that are more relevant. The article appears neutral, no bias is detected in the information. Could include both advantages and limitations of search and rescue dog use to ensure all is covered. Notification at the top of the article indicates that sources need additional citations for verification and that the article possible contains original research. Includes images of both historic and current search and rescue dogs. Last conversation in the talk was shared in 2021. Flagged for possible copyright issue, along with merging two articles (mercy dog and search and rescue dog). It is part of two different wiki projects: WikiProject Dogs and WikiProject Disaster management. I also believe this article could be merged with detection dog. Overall, I believe the article is under developed and could contain more information about the application of search and rescue dogs, training and the limitations of their work and their handlers work.