User:Ca$hley/Dissociative disorder/BrownBoy1999 Peer Review

General info
(Ca$hley)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:


 * So far, the content added is relevant to the topic of disasscoaitve disorders. The neuroscience of the disorder can be difficult inherently, but I feel like you do a good job with how you present the information.
 * The content looks to be up-to-date. I do notice how one part seems to come from the DSM-IV so I was wondering if there is any information from the DSM-5-TR?

Tone and Balance:


 * Most of the content added so far is neutral. I do not think any of this information paints individuals with DID in a negative light nor is there anything I believe is not fair nor backed up with data. I believe a paragraph talking about individuals with DID as clients and maybe even a strength(s) if presented in the research could help balance the seemingly bleak picture behind the reality of neuroscience.

Sources and References:


 * You have a good number of sources, and everything seems to be backed up by an article. I wonder if the first few sentences come from a different article than the one listed after the third sentence, though? Or does it also come from that article?

Organization:


 * I think the organization so far is great! The information is inherently dense but I do not feel like I am getting bogged down in too much information. The only thing I would suggest is that the first line be separated from the first paragraph but that is personal preference.

Wrap-Up:


 * Overall, I think the information added contributes a lot to the article! It is straight to the point. As stated earlier, a few sentences dedicated to talking about individuals with DID in a clinical light perhaps in a different area could provide a different perspective to the topic!