User:Ca/Notability goals

Wikipedia's system of notability is convoluted, beginner unfriendly, unenforced, and has an unclear purpose. Here is plans to improve it

Simple goals:


 * Retitle Notability (sports) into something else. After the 2022 RfC, this SNG has tranformed itself into something different than rest of the SNGs, and thus requires a retitle.
 * Deprecate Notability (geographic features) for disputed territories
 * GNG should met for controversial topics - this is one of the steps
 * Require higher standard of sourcing for controversial topics - more room for NPOV issues.

Major goals:


 * Clarify what notability even is
 * Idea: In Wikipedia, Notability is a set of criteria used to determine if an article about a given subject can be written in a way that conforms to all of Wikipedia's major policies and guidelines. For example, there must be enough sources to show that the article represents all viewpoints.
 * Clarify how it is related to other policies
 * Add a section to the main notability guideline
 * Show that SNGs are just indicators for sufficient sourcing. However, they may lower of the threshold for non-controversial topics
 * Elevate NSPECIES into a guideline.
 * It's being used like one, no need to have it stay as an essay.

Steps:


 * RfCs