User:Ca147990/sandbox

Article Evalutation Euthanasia Last sentence in first paragraph missing citation. While researching, I cam across this article: https://watermark.silverchair.com/52-2-326.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAbIwggGuBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggGfMIIBmwIBADCCAZQGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMpn8zPoleRgosICIZAgEQgIIBZQ7NG0Wp4ALXDvjl2eLOEIHn83ctq--nvDi0TKseEqWRJU_gGa0TKxHKIwDHaGRZoz7xqdd485oClkyIGPbyHeDvouQk2FJXWsAd0Fpwa16-iCgWwzR3zKRpw718gosd4G1juv_abz10jCoo-DAS3A3wViJsusXAgr0-3v1GMCZxQosq5iVDWKfH6m2iXvlJcOQ-APKYRcfWxNarkRoDY80DKGxrpz1CgDJ642vJ1LRTwLj4UDcnhk_FtyGyFKt1YNC0R39IW_LTLuy3Vao8LCmp0poMZCOBAw3crEyjdhpOmcgB8t4zyIHuFUe-bnJ0gdfUqwbEZ2UYhGH6DjhMYUg9sNIcKhGTy_GuTxWp3-a5KGdMjErEJ4_Y9d3sivkwCng_zhRBMNtSZ0TueC6Fj8LvWIE125BBoLX7vsXQMmCFHZjIFOzzBtDhSnVOctK8dvTJzrbZOy3E_ZC-Ba0O6IoXF4m2Tg which clearly states clearly states differently than what the editor said in the last sentence.

In the second paragraph, this sentence: "Active euthanasia however is legal or de facto legal in only a handful of countries (ex. Belgium, Canada, Switzerland) and is limited to specific circumstances and the approval of councilors and doctors or other specialists." requires a comma after however.

The third paragraph of the introduction has accurate information with good sources.

In the second paragraph of the definition, the source they use to describe the definition of euthanasia is a very old source from the 1970's.

In paragraph 3 of the definition, sources 10 and 13 are also quite dated, also being from the 1970's.

Definition section offers many different definitions, but many citations are from over 30 years ago

Claims in definition section that any euthanasia other than voluntary euthanasia is murder and spends a long time on that idea, comes off as biased.

States multiple different types of euthanasia.

Give solid ancient history with relevant sources.

Early modern periood covers multiple pov's and gives details and quotes with relevant citations

Contemporary Euthanasia covered POV of people who support it well enough, but does not cover opposition POV well enough.

Early Modern Euthanasia Movement- 2nd paragraph, Adler spelled wrong. Covers history with solid citations.

1930's Britain- 1st paragraph could use a source to verify info, but other than that good citations and details.

Nazi Euthanasia Program- Properly cited and does good at showing how crappy this system can be in the wrong hands.

1949 New York State Petition for Euthanasia and Catholic Opposition- 1st Paragraph only has one source; may need a couple. Gives solid quote that shows catholic stance on Euthanasia.

Euthanasia Debate-1st paragraph has no sources for its info; 2 and 3 have solid citations. Section offers good view on current debate.

Legal Status- Paragraphs have solid sources and are correctly cited; 3rd paragraph, add comma after "commonly".

Physician Sentiment- offers solid stats on what doctors think about the topic in the US and UK, but could maybe offer some stats from some other countries.

Religious views- Offers view on Euthanasia from the POV of Christianity and its sects, Judaism, and Islam. Could maybe use other religions pov on the subject.