User:CadeCaggiano/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Thirteen Reasons Why


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, everything that is included stays on topic.
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes, for the most part.
 * Does each claim have a citation? No
 * Are the citations reliable? Yes but some citations lead to a dead link.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? It mentions one, but doesn't elaborate on marginalized students in schools as much as it could.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * https://www.getunderlined.com/13-reasons-why-book-vs-show/
 * https://popularculturereview.wordpress.com/volume-30-number-1-winter-2019/wilson/
 * http://www.thirteenreasonswhy.com/thirteenreasonswhy.html

Option 2

 * Article title
 * One Dad, Two Dads, Brown Dad, Blue Dads


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes it stays on topic.
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes it's pretty objective for the most part.
 * Does each claim have a citation? No, a handful of claims are without citation.
 * Are the citations reliable? Generally yes, but there are a couple that are questionable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Yes, it tackles the topic of children raised in same sex marriage households, something that is historically underrepresented.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-55583-848-5
 * https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352856712_Deconstructing_the_Textual_Representation_of_the_Fathers_in_the_Fantasy_Picturebook_One_Dad_Two_Dads_Brown_Dad_Blue_Dads_1994
 * https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/misc/article/view/5861/4865

Option 3

 * Article title
 * When Megan Went Away


 * Article Evaluation\
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes the content is on topic.
 * Is it written neutrally? Yes the it elaborates on both positive and negative receptions.
 * Does each claim have a citation? No, the plot and introduction sections do not contain a citation.
 * Are the citations reliable? For the most part yes, but the entire citation section is not formatted correctly which makes it look unreliable.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Yes it was the first picture book to cover LGBTQ characters.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * https://raisethemrighteous.com/2019/04/30/jane-severances-when-megan-went-away-1979/
 * https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236828009_Setting_the_Record_Straight_An_Interview_with_Jane_Severance
 * NOT VERY MANY SOURCES

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources