User:Cadebabade/Marleen Gorris/Aljill Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cadebabade


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cadebabade/Marleen_Gorris?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Marleen Gorris

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall: There are a lot of grammatical and syntactical errors that need to be fixed. The composition of the edits feels messy because of this.

Content: There doesn't seem to be much of an overt change but the content added is good.

Organization: I think the organization is sound.

Tone: Again, because of the grammatical errors, the tone doesn't really come through

Resources: The sources seem to be appropriate and impartial. All good!

Response to feedback
I will re edit my contributions and fix the grammatical errors. That's really the only note that was given.