User:Cadentf/Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center/Breannazenisek Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

cadentf


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * file:///C:/Users/17243/Downloads/English%20101%20Draft%20(1).pdf

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think the information added remains very neutral. Caden adds useful information about the historical events, sections that may have been left out, and a lot more. When reading an article, it is nice knowing the background of the topic and having some knowledge of its history. I think one point that maybe could have been presented a little more is the events mentioned in the proposal, is the ones that have occurred over the decade. The history added covers a lot of resourceful information from noble secondary sources. The bibliography is very nicely set up so that any reader or reviewer can verify information. I have checked a few links, which all seemed to work and backed up all of the information provided. Another good aspect of your writing is the conciseness. The article was worded very well and it was clear everything being taught. Over all, I think a little more detail could have been added to the history, but it is a very clear, thought-out article which would help many readers into learning more about the Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center.