User:CaitlinSchmill/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Women in medicine)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose this article because I am very much interested in science and how more women have come into medicine. I like how far back it goes in time to show how far women have come in society.)

Evaluate the article
This article has a good lead section. It has an introduction, its clear and concise, and gives a brief description of the topic at hand. The content is relevant to the topic, and it is up to date. I would say this article is neutral. Although it is mostly about women, it does not negatively speak about men. It mostly talks about the rise of women in medicine. There are many reliable secondary sources that back up this information. The links do work. The writing is clear and professional and easy to read. This article is well organized as well. There is a plentiful amount of different pictures through time. There are plenty of edits, and lots of questions regarding the article. This article is part of the WikiProjects. This is a detailed article that expands on women over centuries that have become more into science and medicine. Women are pursuing more career roles that were mostly for men. I do think that the article could be a bit shorter. It is one of the shorter ones, but I think things could be a more concise. It is a well-developed article.