User:Caitlincaterinichia/Opioid use disorder/Ngwinn Peer Review

General info
(Catlincaterinichia)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Caitlincaterinichia/Opioid use disorder
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The peer does a great job of adding relevant and substantial information to their topic. They broke down their additions into two parts. In part one, they agree with how the primary authors do a sufficient job of covering all the required points for this particular topic. However, two of the five sources linked in this portion are within the preferred five-year time span. In the second part, the peer suggests add-ons to the symptom portion of this article, as well as information to add to the prevention portion of this article. The sources listed are not within the preferred five-year span but are very credible sources, and all of the links work. The peer's tone and balance throughout the new information remain neutral. With this particular peer's topic being opioid use disorder, I am interested in whether they will include any information on the social impact of opioid use disorder on certain sectors of the population.