User:CalWilNyc/France–Mali relations/Aleksander Ramirez Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CalWilNyc


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CalWilNyc/France%E2%80%93Mali_relations?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * France–Mali relations

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * no real lead

Content:


 * yes its relevant, original was very lacking
 * yes it is up to date
 * could use more sources
 * it addresses some equity gaps

Tone and balance:


 * generally neutral tone
 * no claims clearly appear biased
 * contend does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of any position nor away from another

Overall peer review


 * could use more sources
 * sources
 * washington post article works
 * can't check if its accurate because i don't have subscription
 * can't access guardian article
 * could use more sources
 * sources pt.2
 * should probably have a more diverse range of sources/ authors
 * a few times where there are pieces of info that are uncited
 * sources are relatively current, could maybe use some a few more sources that were published more recently
 * wiki specifically asks if there are opportunities to replace news articles with peer reviewed sources, and yes that applies


 * sources pt.3
 * as specified above, one link works, one does not
 * Organization
 * organization is still in drafting stage
 * content is concise, clear, easy to read
 * content does not have grammar/ spelling errors
 * content is well organized


 * images and media
 * N/A
 * Overall
 * content did improve overall quality of article
 * strengths include breadth of content added
 * content could be improved with more sources/ more diverse sources/ fixing a few links
 * also inclusion of lead to reflect additions made to the article