User:Calaclacka/Adrar Bous/Mdg132 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Calaclacka


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Adrar Bous


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Adrar Bous

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section clearly explains what the article is about. The article has a brief description detailing what the Adrar Bous is and who discovered this site. I think that the content added to the article is all relevant and helpful to the reader understanding more about the topic. I think that this is a new article, and I see that the author used 5 sources which helps prove its notability. The contents table is helpful for the reader to see the divisions of the site and what artifacts were found in which location. The article links to other articles which is useful and the headings were helpful and necessary as well. There are occasional typos and also some of the sentences are suggestive of an argument for the presence of cattle pastoralists.