User:Calgary12345/sandbox

/Disability Etiquette Person First Language

Like many other minority groups, disabled people do not always agree on what constitutes politically correct language. However, see the List of disability-related terms with negative connotations and people-first language.

I would change this line to say: " Like many other minority groups, people with varying abilities do not always agree on what constitutes politically correct language. However the List of disability-related terms with negative connotations and people-first language.

Wikipedia Laboratory Assessment

Evaluation of a Wikipedia Article Copy this rubric into your sandbox and complete an evaluation of your selected article. You may find you use both good and bad tables for your article. Wikipedia Quality - Good - Rate from 1/10: Explain your rating

The Lead section is understandable- 10: The lead section was very clear and to the point

The structure is clear- 6: Structure is clear but has limited information

Good balance - 5: I think there is balance with the information that is written but could have more

Coverage is neutral	- 4: I do not believe the coverage is neutral. The recommendations definitely seemed to be someone’s opinion not based on facts

Reliable sources - 2: There were no academic resources they were websites

Wikipedia quality - bad -Rate from 1/10:	Explain your rating

Has a warning banner on top- 10: The article has a number of issues

Language Problems in Lead section- 1:	I did not see any issues with the language

Unsourced opinion & value statements - 8:There was a lot of opinions throughout the article

Too general statements - 3: I did not see too many general statements

Aspects of the topic are missing - 10: There are a number of things that could be added to this article but there are other articles to cover this information

Overly long relative to importance - 1: This article is not long at all

Few references or lacks footnotes - 10:	There was not near enough references

Hostile dialogue in talk page - 5: I did not think there was hostile talk but there was some aggressive talk. I don’t think it was aggressive enough to be considered ‘hostile’