User:Callalily4/Dissociation (psychology)/AveryLong5 Peer Review

General info
Callalily4
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Callalily4/Dissociation (psychology)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dissociation (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
My first impression of this article was very positive! The beginning of the article provided information to explain what dissociation is and how it has been classified. The definition from the DSM-5 shows the groupings of dissociation and similar issues. Overall, the article is set up very well. I agree with you, Callie, that there can be more information provided in the history section. I feel like there is a gap between Janet's original thoughts of dissociation and the dissociation we know today. The tone of this article is unbiased and neutral. It is evident that the purpose of this article is to inform readers about dissociation. Continually, the references seem to be valid and up to date. I liked that this article had headings talking about how dissociation can occur through trauma, drug use, or neurological issues. Towards the end of the article, specifically the treatment section, could use more information. Additionally, I think information about what to do when someone dissociates to keep the person and oneself safe is needed. I'm excited to see what you add!