User:CamDoran/Integral membrane protein/AshePlattz001 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? CamDoran
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Integral membrane protein

Lead
The article's lead is well written, introducing the concept quite concisely without leaving out key details. The introduction itself is quite short, and it assumes you have prior knowledge of other related topics (as you should). Anything the reader may be unaware of is properly linked to other articles explaining them.

Content
The content within the article is all important to the concept, but it lacks any explanation of the history behind the discovery of it. It has essential information that one needs to know about the topic, but it isn't incredibly thorough.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the article remains neutral, not pushing for any message, and simply conveying information regarding integral membrane proteins.

Sources and References
The article contains few resources, but are all properly reference throughout the article. Additional references to verify the information would make it more solid.

Organization
Information within the article is concise and readable. There are some weird differences in bolded text versus sub titles of sections, but it's not a heavy influencer in the readability.

Images and Media
The article has a few images for the small amount of information it provides. There could have been more images to showcase some of the other structures being mentioned in the article.

Overall impressions
The article has a small amount of information for the topic, but it contains relevant information regardless. There could be more images, and the bolding issue could be fixed with easy if needed. It is a decent article overall.