User:Cameron Kletke/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Jonathan Leunbach

(Provide a link to the article here.)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Leunbach

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I wasn't aware of who Jonathan Leunbach was until I was browsing sexology and found his name. My preliminary impression was, wow, this individual sounds like he made a difference in Denmark in regards to women's sexual reproduction rights.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section of this article was concise and overall gave the reader great insight into who Leunbach was and what he did, although some of the information was missing a reference. Most of Leunbachs life, him being a socialist, having a respected name, organizations he co-founded, etc. this information does not have any link to a reference. Perhaps this information is stated in some references listed in the bottom of the article, but it is not explicitly linked. The sources seem current but most are not peer-reviewed, and all are written in Danish. The links are working links and almost all are very short, about a page in length.

Overall the article's status feels unfinished, as there are still many citations still needed to verify most of the facts of Leunbach's life. It is underdeveloped and could also mention Denmark's current day position in regards to women's reproductive rights.

Cameron Kletke (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Cameron Kletke