User:Cameronieropoli/Forensic palynology/Kimberly.N1 Peer Review

General info
cameronieropoli
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Forensic palynology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Forensic palynology - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Very strong lead, lays out the bases of your article, the tone of your article is good. the article is organized, it is concise and easy to read, you could put headers above your paragraphs to better present your work. had good reliable references and was able to follow the links. maybe add some pictures to help visual the collection process or maybe add a picture of what pollen looks like under the microscope. overall good article.