User:Cameronmac1/Canntaireachd/Bmkler23 Peer Review

General info
(Cameronmac1)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:canntaireachd
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Everything that will be added to the article is relevant to the topic, and nothing is distracting. The article is neutral, with no claims being biased one way or another. No viewpoints are over represented or underrepresented. The links in the sources work, and the source supports the claims in the article. The addition is backed up by a reliable source. None of the new information is out of date. Overall, this is a great addition.