User:Camie22/sandbox

John charles Lounsbury Fish: 2018-02-23

 * Everything outlined in the article was relevant to the topic. The article spoke about the subject's life timeline and work.
 * The article has a neutral stands on the subject discussed.
 * The subject's contribution outside of civil engineering was highly underrepresented.
 * The "principle of Engineering Economics link does not work.
 * Each fact stated in the article was reference with an reliable and appropriate reference. However the author should have used multiple references within the article.
 * The talk page includes student evaluations of the article.
 * The article is noted as a subject of an educational assignment.

Body of Knowledge: 2018-02-23

 * The content of the article was relevant to the topic at hand.
 * The article was relatively neutral, the author gave a wide variety of definitions and examples of Body of knowledge.
 * The article had an adequate number of citations and reference. the information given was very up-to-date.
 * A few of the links within the article was not working, the author needs to review the article and make the necessary edit to correct this.
 * The article is rated as Sub-Class on the project's quality scale. The article was also the subject of an educational assignment and within the scope of WikiProject philosophy . Comments on he talk page suggested ways in which the author can improve the article in terms of grammar and sentence construction.

Engineering Economics: 2018-03-03

 * The article outline and explained the concepts of engineering economics very well and in detail.
 * The article was very neutral.
 * The article over represented the concepts of Engineering Economics, they neglected to include the background and application of the topic being discussed.
 * The sources cited in the article is supported by the claims outlined.
 * The Article had an appropriate amount of references and all the links worked and reference to relevant additional information.
 * The article talk page had evaluations from students on how the author can improve the article.
 * Is it a part of any WikiProjects? the article is apart of the following wikiProjects: WikiProjects Business, Economics, Engineering, Systems and Technology. The article was also the subject of an educational assignment.

Gerald W. Smith: 2018-04-03

 * Everything in the article was relevant to the article topic.
 * His career life seemed to be a little over represented in the article, little information on his background was given.
 * All the citation and links works, the informations cited all supported the topic.
 * The information in the article was cited from Engineering Economy: Analysis if Capital Expenditures Second Addition written by the topic of this article. Also Sioux City Journal.
 * The talk page of the article features article evaluation and advise as to how the author can improve he article quality.
 * The article is rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale and apart of the WikiProject Biography. The article was also apart of an educational assignment.

William Milnor Roberts: 2018-04-03

 * Everything outlined in the article is relevant to the article's topic.
 * The article had a very neutral viewpoint, it outlines the topic life, background, career, death and legacy. The outline was organized.
 * The sources referenced supported the claims in the article. However, A few of the links do not work.
 * The article had reliable references all the information came from reliable and well cite sources.
 * The article talk page had recommendations for edits to the article that could improve its quality.
 * The article is apart of the following wikiProjects: WikiProjects Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Biography and Trains. The article was also the subject of an educational assignment and a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.