User:Camilla.zecker/sandbox

*******For my language page draft, please go to my second sandbox by adding a '2' at the end of the url of this current sandbox page. Thanks!*******
Language Death Article Evaluation:
 * 1) There was no information that was super distracting to me.
 * 2) I don't think there is much that should be added, but I don't know enough about the topic to be confident in that.
 * 3) There is one section that has a warning about needing additional citations for verification. It could use more sources otherwise it's at risk for having that information taken down.
 * 4) There is a mixture of old (2000 ish) and new (2016 ish) information. The old sources could be updated but at least the whole page isn't using sources from 2000 or earlier.
 * 5) There were some long posts in the Talk page about adding information that I thought would be quite distracting so I am glad that it wasn't included.
 * 6) Many of the talk pages were relevant (some seemed a little unprofessional) but many are very old (over 10 years ago).
 * 7) The article seemed very factual and not too biased in any specific direction.
 * 8) One of the citation links took me to the MSN homepage, not the specific page it was referencing, so that should be corrected.
 * 9) Another citation did take me to the correct paper.
 * 10) Overall the citations seem to be coming from reliable sources.
 * 11) The article was part of a Wiki Education Foundation project with a student editor.
 * 12) The page is rated as level 4 vital article for Languages.
 * 13) I also learned that there is a WikiProject for Endangered Languages (!) (and Languages in general) that this article is a part of.
 * 14) There were some good suggestions on the talk page (like about graphics that weren't helpful) that seem to have been accepted and I agreed with that.
 * 15) There were some posts about external links being broken so it's good that those are being monitored and removed/fixed if they are not working.