User:Cammey3/Massage-pain relief/WynnUCBA Peer Review

General info
User:Cammey3/Massage-pain relief
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cammey3/Massage-pain relief
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article does very well explaining the types of massage therapy for different types of people with illnesses. What impressed me is how important the treatment is depending on the person. I didn't know that a cancer patient needs a special type of massage therapy. Changes I would suggest is what the message therapy would look like. for example, how would they lay a person down and massage their body. Do they press harder or more gently than a regular person. The most important thing the author could do is explain what the massage would look like for someone with a illness. After reviewing the article i can not find anything in common with my article.

Article Lead Section

Looking at the Lead I do feel satisfied that I know what the article is talking about. The lead does give the most important information. Each lead section gives enough information for each massage therapy and after reading the lead I know enough information about that massage therapy.

Structure

The sections are well organized. Each section's length is almost equal to each other there is just a little bit of more informstion in a couple than in another but its not to obvious that it causes a problem or knocks the section out of line. The article does reflect all perspectives. It gives good examples and reasons for people who have illness and also people who are fine. also When it comes to therapy skin color does not matter. The article does not try to grab the readers and try to convince them.

Neutral Content

After reading the article I could guess the authors perspective is second person. There are no words that don't feel neutral. The article does make claims that say "some people say". The article gives helpful information that are positive information. there is no negative information presented.

Reliable Sources

Most of the statements are connected to a reliable source. there are no statements that have the same article all the statements have different articles that make different claims. I think there are parts that could have a source that do not have a source. Some of the article may be a little out of date or are close to becoming. I think five years is too long for an article.