User:Camp5927/Evaluate an Article

This is a review of the Wikipedia article titled "Zunil (crater)." The lead sentence presents the main topic clearly and concisely. The first paragraph begins describing the history rather than describing the structure and topics of the article. It contains information about discovery that is not within the articles sections. The content of the article is good. It covers the basics of the crater without giving too much detail. I wish the article gave a bit more detail on the landslides, but I may be bias towards landslide information. The article is written neutrally and the topics are balanced. The facts are backed up by sources that are from research groups and universities. There is one citation from a magazine but it is accompanied by a scholarly source. The organization of the article could be a bit better. I think splitting it into more subcategories would make information easier to find and make the article easier to read. Images are helpful and well-captioned. This article is part of the WikiProject Solar System. Overall, the article gave the information I was looking for and linked to appropriate places for me to get more information. I think a few minor changes to the structure would help the article make a better impression.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)