User:CampbellParsons/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Apple Arcade
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * Interested in Apple Inc. as a brand.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The lead is clear and concise
 * Doos the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * It does include a brief description.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * The information the lead is also discussed in other parts of the article
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is concise and to the point. It may need more details
 * The lead is concise and to the point. It may need more details

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * the content is only relevant to the topic
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * The content is up to date, the only information that needs to be updates consistently is the games being added to the service monthly
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There is content missing and should be added. There is no information that does not belong

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * The article is neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * There are no sections that are biased
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The feature section is under represented
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * The articles does not attempt to persuade the reader in a favor.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * The facts are all backed by reputable apple reviews sites.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * The sources are used heavily to this day
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The links do work
 * The links do work

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * It is well Written and easy to read. Concise and clear
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * There are no grammatical or spelling mistakes
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The article is well-organized and broken down into section. There are only three sections and more should be added

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * There is an image of the logo. More images should be added
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Image is well captions
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * It does adhere to the copyright regulations
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * The image is laid out in an appealing way

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are limited conversations going on behind the scenes
 * There is a discussions on "The  in the stylization is a private use unicode character. It might show up as a square or other blank symbol on devices."
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * It is not rated
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * The articles has good information as of now but more needs to be added to make it more informative.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The articles strengths is the list of games it displays, although it should be updated.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * The articles defiantly should be updated and given more data.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * This article is underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: