User:Campenhe6493/Epidemiology of measles/Lolla47 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Campenhe6493, Myhrwomr1621


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Campenhe6493/Epidemiology_of_measles?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Epidemiology of measles

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead - I think it would be beneficial to add to the lead that along with the lifelong immunity if survived the infection, there are also vaccination available. Maybe add some more info about how it has been recently, how COVID-19 has affected and what is going on regarding measles currently.

Content - I think the extra content added is great. A lot of the countries info in the article are older data so the addition of the more recent data is very revenant and it goes within the same lines of what the older data wanted to convey. Definitely Madagascar, Japan, and Ireland, would need some more info, for the ones that have more recent data maybe give a background of how it used to be. I know sometimes it can be hard to find data available for some countries.

Tone and Balance - As I have said previously, I think the additions are great, they follow the same ideas of the information that was already there, and if that was there, it means it passed the guidelines, so I think the data you are adding is neutral. I think maybe there could be a comparison between underprivileged countries vs developed countries, but that would require some more work to make sure it is not biased, so mostly it is just a thought.

Sources and References - I think overall the citations are great, the data added is more recent than most of the info that is presented at the articles, so I think overall is great with the data and sources addition.

Organization - Great job, I think the info is added at a point that it makes sense with the data already presented.

Overall Impressions - I think that the additions chosen by the group are relevant and needed. It adds recent data, it is presented is very well, is flows nicely with the things already written in the article and overall there are a few suggestions for improvements, but so far I think you've done a great job with your addition.