User:Camrynli19/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * Climate of Antarctica: Climate of Antarctica
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

Lead

 * The introduction could contain more information.
 * Mentions katabatic winds in the Lead but not again.
 * Very brief

Content

 * Content relevant to the topic.
 * Contains many sources that were published within the last five years.
 * Not any content missing necessarily, just brief and could go into greater detail.

Tone and Balance

 * Article is neutral.
 * Does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position.

Sources and References

 * Article provides several sources.
 * Most sources are current.
 * Diverse spectrum of authors.
 * One link listed in the references section does not work however, the rest do.

Organization

 * Slightly disorganized, information is kind of thrown sporadically at reader.
 * Could not Organization evaluation
 * Divided into sections but could use more sections, and some of the sections already there could use more information.

Images and Media

 * Included a few different types of maps.
 * Two images could use better captions, very vague.
 * Seems images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

Checking the talk page

 * Little conversation. One comment about one source being no good, and then two comments about external links being modified.
 * It is a C-Class High Importance article. It is part of WikiProject Antartica, WikiProject Environment, and WikiProject Climate Change.

Overall impressions

 * Article has an abundant amount of sources, and also has charts and graphs with information to make it clear to the reader.
 * Could contain more sections. Ice cover, precipitation, and climate change sections could also use more information.
 * A little underdeveloped, but almost there.