User:Camstr32/Ludwig prandtl/Gwa19 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Camstr32


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Camstr32/Ludwig prandtl


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ludwig Prandtl

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section seems to be missing, would any of your updates to the article belong in this section to provide a correct and updated lead section?

I have not made any updates to the lead section yet. If I am able to find good information to add, I will.

The content you have added to the Early Life section is very neutral and useful information to this article.

Thanks.

The References section appears to be missing entirely, the original article has many sources listed that appear to be good sources with a wide variety. I would suggest moving those over as well as any of your own sources to your draft to ensure that you are not plagiarizing. There are no in text citations linking to the bibliography page or the references portion. I would suggest to cite these as you write them and include that so you do not forget to do that later.

I added my citations and references.

Your organization is very well done and very easy to follow.

Thanks.