User:Candencemcneil/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
CVS Health

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article because it gave information towards the pharmaceutical business of CVS and how it became a nationwide company. Before choosing this article I thought that it would be about the basis of CVS Health, excluding the history. This matters because if I was someone who was not familiar with CVS Health I would want to know the basic information of what they do and how they may operate.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article of CVS Health start's off with brief lead section that defines what CVS Health is. However, it does not discuss the topis that would mentioned throughout the article and jumps straight into the history of CVS. Throughout the article a neutral tone is consistent with only facts contributing to the topic being presented. There was no bias information or prejudice remarks. While looking through the references it could be seen that most information came from secondary sources with none coming directly from a CVS health website. The structure of the article was broken up into sections that included paragraphs about information and sometimes data charts. However the paragraphs sometimes included a lot of information that could be broken up into bullet points. No images were included in the article. The talk page of the article only included updates in article editing such as links that were/ could be used and references to other wiki articles. The main strength of the article was the inclusion of specific years in which events occurred along with data charts. But as mentioned before some information I feel can be typed in a listed manner rather than a full paragraph. Overall, I think the article well-developed by both giving information and presenting it in a simple manner in which people can understand easily.