User:Candles59/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Near-death experience

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because death in itself is something that strongly interests me. It is fascinating to be able to give explanations closest to one's beliefs as well as others'. Near-death experiences are in most cases, major awakenings in people's lives, so it is important for it to be a topic that is sufficiently talked about.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section:

- The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.

- Yes, the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections. It speaks about sensations including detachment from the body, feelings of levitation, total serenity, security, warmth, the experience of absolute dissolution, and the presence of a light.

- No

-The Lead is brief and isn't over explained.

Content:

- It is relevant to the topic.

- It seems to have been updated recently.

-No

-No

Tone And Balance:

- The article has a neutral view and has no religious bias.

Sources and References:

-All facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.

- They are somewhat thorough

- The sources are recent

- There were multiple sources by a diverse number of qualified professionals

- Most links work.

Organization and writing quality:

- The article is concise, clear, and easy to read.

- The article does not have any grammatical or spelling errors.

- The organization is somewhat broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.

Images and Media:

- the article includes images that enhance understanding of the topic.

-One of the images isn't very well captured

- Yes

-Yes

Talk page discussion:-There seems to be a discussion about validity of statements and sources.

-The article is spoken about in more of a scientific way

Overall impressions:

-I like the detail that the article goes in for specifics but I wish the broader aspects were further developed/explained.

-I would add more writing into the beginning of the article.

- I believe this article is developed.