User:Candyw5268/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
.)


 * 1) Todd, James T. (13 July 2012). "The moral obligation to be empirical: Comments on Boynton's 'Facilitated Communication - what harm it can do: Confessions of a former facilitator'". Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. 6 (1): 36–57. doi:10.1080/17489539.2012.704738. S2CID 143043194.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I use AAC daily with my students and my own dauther that is non-verbal and I struggle to better implement the process of accuquisition to ensure independent communication.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The opening and lead to this article are straight forward and to the point giving you exactly what will be discussed and covered by the article it is not overly detailed but consise.

It is a form of augmentative communication but shows a failed system of augmentative communication so in learning about what will work you should understand what will not work.

There is a heavier biased to this artile by stating the harmful effects that it can cause on the users of the devices.

There is facts to back up the claims of the article.

There are images that include, however they could be improved and updated.

I would have changed the title to focus more on the vaired types of communications and the history without going into harmful effects, this can show biased.