User:Canesandpeace/Christian Goldbach/Mpg125 Peer Review


 * Overall looks very professional
 * I think it could benefit from adding a lead section to give a brief overview
 * The new content is much more informative than the current page
 * The tone and balance are great
 * Good job with presenting a neutral, factual representation
 * Sources look good as well, no issues with the links
 * Is the "Russian Government Work" section supposed to be under the "Professional Work" heading? Because from the context it seems like it should be. If this was intentionally done though I'm sure you have a reason for it.
 * The first small paragraph under "Professional Work" also seems a bit out of place
 * Maybe add in a photo or painting of him
 * Overall, very strong improvements to the original, just wanted to highlight the organizational questions.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)