User:CanyonMoon44/Active listening/Fluffpups Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CanyonMoon44


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CanyonMoon44/Active_listening?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Active listening

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

I think the lead paragraph for your article looks great. The first sentence gives a great overview of the topic and when I read it I felt like I understood a general overview of active listening. It is also nice and concise. You could consider adding a general overview of the sections of the article to the lead paragraph.

Content:

The article has a great tone! The sentences are clear and concise. The whole article is very easy to read. The technique paragraph is broken down in to an easy to follow structure which is great! I appreciated the criticism section and understanding the other point of view. If you wanted to, you could expand that paragraph slightly to add more of the opposing point of view. Tone and Balance:

I think the article maintains a neutral tone and isn't trying to persuade the reader.

Sources and References:

There are a few sentences that are not cited in the article. I know my article has a lot of things that aren't cited as well, if you are able to find the original sources that would be great to add the citations to the article! Source number 21 "What is Active Listening" is just a direct quote, maybe you could try to rephrase it so it doesn't need to be quoted. The article has a wide range of sources and they cover a wide range of time including current sources. The links in the references section work.

Organization:

I think the article is well organized. The way the sections are structured is logical and is easy to follow.

I think you added great content and the article is in a good place. There are some missing citations so if you can find those or try to get all the material in the article cited I think that would make it even better. You did a great job at maintaining a neutral tone.