User:CanyonMoon44/Active listening/Marzipan Calicoco Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CanyonMoon44


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:CanyonMoon44/Active listening


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Active listening

Lead
CanyonMoon44 has copied the lead into their sandbox and it appears they may be considering revising it and/or adding an additional source. The current lead on the article is lengthy and vague in terms of defining active listening. If not already planning to do so, I suggest CanyonMoon44 revise the lead for clarity.

Content / Tone / Sources / Organization

CanyonMoon44 has updated the article to include the three types of barriers to active listening and is using our course textbook as a source. I think this is an excellent idea and great expansion of the article. Presently, this sandbox draft looks there's a plan to expand on each of the three barriers. This will also be a good choice for updating this article. There are additional subsections copied into the sandbox that are marked in the original article as needing clarification and I assume CanyonMoon44 intends to update these sections as well.

Overall

The sandbox draft looks like CanyonMoon44 is planning to update some key necessary sections of the article, including the lead and select subsections. CanyonMoon44 has two reliable sources listed in the sandbox, which I would suggest they add to their bibliography page as well. Overall, it looks like there's a solid plan for updating this article and, assuming we keep the same peer review articles going forwards, I'll look forward to seeing the changes they implement.