User:Captain.Chatterbox/Impacts of COVID-19 on US Foster Care/Eta Cas Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Captain.Chatterbox
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Captain.Chatterbox/Impacts of COVID-19 on US Foster Care

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
N/A -> add a lead!

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes.

Content evaluation
There are sections where this reads like an essay, not an article. Consider comparing with similar articles, especially when you provide examples. (I don't read a lot of Wikipedia articles on current events, so I don't know how they use examples, but maybe consider checking if/how they use examples.)

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Not all of it.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Some do.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Yes.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? A bit.

Tone and balance evaluation
Be very careful with this topic. There are sections where your wording is a bit leading. You use the leading phrase "doctors believe" in your introduction. One of your examples in "Impacts on Identification" is set in England, which is not within the scope of your article on the US Foster Care System.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Sources and references evaluation
Nice selection of sources!

Consider adding a citation to the first paragraph of your section on "Impact on Family Courts."

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Organization evaluation
You've chosen great sections that breakdown the topic into easy to understand pieces, great work!

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Fairly exhaustive. Yes.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No.

New Article Evaluation
You might consider linking this page to other articles, such as connecting it to the American Child Welfare System page, the page for the Cook Children's Medical Center in Fort Worth, etc.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Well laid out; obviously well researched.
 * How can the content added be improved? Could use a more neutral overview.

Overall evaluation
Overall, this is an excellent article! It is well laid out, easy to read, and provides good information on the topic. The main concern is that it does read like an essay in some places, especially where you provide examples. Consider staying away from examples and providing general facts.

I look forward to reading this article again!