User:Captain (Casey Costigan)/Costigan Pictures/Slomo321 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

The work I am reviewing is Captain (Casey Costigan)'s Costigan Pictures Wikipedia Article


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Captain%20(Casey%20Costigan)/Costigan_Pictures?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
For the Lead, it's pretty good, but it also feels a bit cluttered and overly detailed. He or she should try condensing it in some way that lists how many movies Costigan created, rather than going into such detail. It's great that Costigan describes what movies he or she's made, but that should go into the body paragraph. The lead also includes information not immediately present in the main body of the article, though this can be confusing for the average reader. Plus, the "Information" tab is not needed.

The content, meanwhile, is really good. It's relevant to the topic, and up-to-date; because this is an article made by the creator his or herself, I doubt there is anything missing or has something that does not belong.

There are no images or media attached; given that the creator of Costigan Pictures is writing the article, he or she should be obtain pictures of whatever he or she created and upload them to the article.

Like my article, the source here are questionable, since they are all YouTube videos, but given that he or she has created the videos, I will let this slide. The article does not link to other articles, though, which is necessary for any Wikipedia article, given that this is something made at West Chester University.

Overall, the article is so-so; it doesn't feel complete, but it also doesn't feel empty, either. The strength of this article is the creator of it giving the history behind the production company, but the content be absolutely improved by rearranging the movies in chronological order so that users aren't confused by it. On top of that, the lead should only give the introduction to the production company, and leave the other information to the body paragraphs. The "References" title should also be added so it doesn't feel like the references section isn't blending in with the "MARK BRYDE SERIES" section.