User:Caramc456/Nurse practitioner/Inesuwineza123 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Caramc456


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Caramc456/Nurse_practitioner?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nurse practitioner

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead was updated very nicely in the draft, highlighting the added information that was added to the article. You made sure to put “add/remove.” This is important because it made it easier for me as the reader to recognize what was improved in the article. Also, I realized how nice and short it was. Even though it is not exceedingly long in length, it has all the essential information that is necessary to understand the topic at hand, which is nurse practitioner. More content was added to further explain the topic. The latest information had back up sources to go back to, so that readers have something to go back to and evaluate if necessary. Something nice that I really liked about this draft is how you added the “Importance during the covid-19 pandemic”, since we were still in the pandemic not long ago. Excellent job on the neutrality aspect on this, personally I could not spot any persuasion, and this is a big part of Wikipedia articles. Overall, this draft was easy to understand, and it has all the vital information. I do not have many suggestions for improvement because you really did an excellent job, and I learned a lot from reading it. One thing I would suggest is adding pictures, for the visual learners. Again, wonderful job on this Cara!