User:Carbon1277/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Amphiregulin

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I wanted an article relating to humanities and sciences. I then ended up looking at the anthropology/genetics section and this was one of the articles listed. I thought it would be interesting to read about AREG (a protein synthesized as transmember glycoprotein). From what I read and saw on the page the information appeared to only present relevent information and have a multitude of sources sited in the information.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The information presented stayed on topic and had a multitude of sources. The links in the citations worked and the ones I clicked on had information relevant and accurately depicted in the article. The tone of the article remained very neutral.