User:Cardinals34/Forest conservation in the United States/IAxolotlQuestions3 Peer Review

General info
Cardinals34
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Forest conservation in the United States


 * User:Cardinals34/Forest conservation in the United States

Lead

 * Additional information in the draft strengthens the current article's leading section. Last sentence of the pre-existing lead could be rewritten to lead into the new information written in the draft.

Content

 * Content is relevant to the article topic and is updated
 * Could potentially expand upon how legislation impacts those of lower-income or urban areas

Tone and Balance

 * Tone is neutral and states the facts without any attempt to persuade audience in any direction

Sources and References

 * Citations were not present when reviewed initially, but have since been updated. References used are of reputable sources and cited correctly.

Organization

 * Draft is well organized and easily fits into the current article format

Images and Media

 * No images or media are present in the draft or current article, but the article could benefit from visual aids of the topics being discussed in order to clearly demonstrate to the reader the types of forests, the damage being done, and how they can be repaired

Overall impressions

 * Draft content has clarified and refined what is already present in the current article. More expansion on the benefits of having the forests and general visual aids will improve the article further.